Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review

Home
The Nul Pointers
Country Rankings
History By Country
History By Year
Forty Facts On ESC
Voting Tables
NP All Time Chart
News / Blog
Ones That Got Away
Love Thy Neighbour
Nul Points Store
Links
Superstars
The Worst Songs?
Congratulations!
Oj Oj Oj!
East Is East
Languages
Voting Changes
Roll Of Honour
Evolution
Medal Table
The UK At Eurovision
A Song For Europe
UK Chart
UK 50: The Vote
The Big Vote
Guestbook

 

 

 

Voting Changes
1970 scoreboard 1973 voting 1998 hi-tech graphics voting
Austere 1970 scoreboard 1973 on-screen voting State of the art 1998 edition

The very first contest in Lugano in 1956 saw a win for the Swiss hosts, but the voting method used is still shrouded in secrecy. All we know is that Lys Assia won, the remainder is lost in the mists of time.

In 1957, the first known system was introduced. Each country had a jury of 10 members and each juror chose their favourite song, so in effect each country had 10 votes to award. This system was used on and off until 1974.

In the early sixties the organisers clearly thought that this system was not perfect, and some other voting systems were tried. In 1962 juries awarded 3-2-1 to their favourite three songs. The next year that became 5-4-3-2-1 to their favourite five.  1964 brought yet another change as 5-3-1 was awarded to the juries' top 3.  The EBU clearly approved of this method as it was retained for the next two contests.

After some serious Scandinavian block voting in 1966, the next year saw a return to the late fifties method of 10 jurors, 10 votes. This was completely found out in 1969 when 4 countries tied for victory and there was no mechanism to split them, so we had 4 winners!.

In 1970 the same system endured, but 4 nations boycotted after the 1969 debacle so the EBU looked for another system. This was debuted in 1971 and lasted for three years.

Each country had just 2 jury members and they were flown to the venue of the contest and placed in a TV studio near the auditorium. There wee rules about the age mix but essentially just 2 people from each country decided the winner of the Grand Prix. Each one awarded between one and five points to each song. This meant that "nul points" was impossible during this era as even the least popular song would receive at least 2 points from every other nation. This system was called into question after the very close 1973 result when three songs were in close contention for victory and all came down to the predilections of a few jurors.

The EBU were thinking about a solution but it wasn't ready for 1974 so we returned for one year only to the 10 jurors - 10 votes system used prior to 1971.  But 1975 saw the advent of the system that has now been in place for 30 years and must be regarded as the most successful:

Each country ranks the other songs, and to it's favourite it awards 12 points. The second favourite receives 10 points, then 8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 for the remainder of the ten favourite songs.  This method has been seen to produce a clear winner, while also rewarding the least popular songs with a few votes (usually!).

Although this method of distributing points remains in place, Eurovision's fifth decade has seen a massive shift from juries to a public telephone vote. This was first pioneered in 1997 and is now obligatory unless phone systems in a specific country are inadequate. Now, after the last song has been performed, a brief reprise of all songs is shown together with telephone numbers to vote for them. 

This development has brought some controversy as in some years the very early sung songs did very badly and the very late songs very well. At the same time, the importance of the song itself has diminished as presentation and stage effects have become more crucial to success.

2004 saw the first ever "semi-final" where 22 countries fought for 10 places in the grand final to join the 14 already there. This was quite unlike the pre-selections of 1993 and 1996.  This time the qualifier was broadcast to 33 of the 36 participating countries and all got to vote. The final saw votes being delivered from all 36 countries including those eliminated in the semi.  The songs that were performed both in the semi and the final did conspicuously well on final night, raising doubts about the fairness of this system.  In 2005 the winner and runner-up were direct finalists but 9 of the next 10 positions (from a field of 24) were occupied by... you guessed it, 9 of the 10 "semi" qualifiers, only Macedonia let the side down in 17th. In 2006 again an astounding eight of the top 10 had advanced from the semi-final and all ten qualifiers finished in the top 12.  Any radio listener will tell you that the more times you hear a song the more likely you are to like it.  In 2008 all but the big four countries and Serbia had to compete in the semi-final, which ensured that those four once more occupied some of the lowest rungs of the final scoreboard.